This Psychic Reading given by Edgar Cayce in 1921 (?).
P R E S E N T
Edgar Cayce; (?), Conductor; (?), Steno.
R E A D I N G
Time of Reading Unknown. ..., Texas.
1. EC: Now, we have here the body of [5421], ..., Texas. They have been and are giving properties, medicinal properties to this body that have not been compounded in the way as was given here. The senna and rhubarb and other properties as were given to this body, part were compounded from old stocks that have carried with them another resistive force. Through their rebuilding and channels they produce microbes in this so that their action and reaction in the system, instead of producing an active principle to carry out the action of the digestive tract and carry from the system the feces were trying or producing more of a condition. The saffron that should have been given to this body, they are using a substitute. Those powders that act as a sedative to the duodenum are overcharged from fumes thrown out by other properties when this is set near it. All of these combined produce a bad condition in the system. Let them have this prepared again and follow the channels if we would reduce the fear and condition that we have in this system.
2. By the keeping of the feces in the system we will find the condition of ulceration in the stomach may become malignant. It will be necessary in that case to remove by the knife if it does not disintegrate the body and the mind and the spirit; if they do that, these conditions are gone.
[GD's note: Above reading was listed originally under her husband's case number, [5771], for the simple reason that her given name was not used and the stenographer evidently left out the "Mrs" which subsequently was used in all her readings, just the "Mrs" in front of her husband's initials. Since her husband [5771] requested six other rdgs. for her and never once requested a rdg. for himself (though he may have obtained one in those early days of which we have no copy), it is evident that the above rdg. was for her and not for Mr. [5771]. Perhaps it even should be numbered 5421-2 instead of 5421-1, since it refers to ingredients recommended in 5421-2.
On the film for preservation of the rdgs., Case 5421-1 is listed as missing and is filmed as 5771-1. Since we do not
5421-1 Page 2
wish to juggle the case numbers around too much, this long explanation is made in order to clarify the difference which will be noted in the authentic original file on film and the master file for indexing and duplication.]